Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A Postmodern View of Evidence-based Medicine (EBM): Barthes. Heidegger, Deleuze and Guattari, and Derrida.

Brian Walsh

Abstract


The language of an EBM paper screams objectivity. The personal interests of the authors are skilfully expunged. These are men and women of science! Taken out altogether are the drivers of the project—desire, interest, professional advancement (surely not money). The EBM paper presents an image. My paper interrogates the objectivity of the subject-object distinction, arguing that it is based on the subject, from Descartes, “I think, therefore I am”. The subject-object distinction, fundamental to science / EBM, is not used by Martin Heidegger. He depicts people immersed in the environment, coping, they hope. Their world is a world that matters, a world of joy and sorrow. Absent is the contrived distinction between subject and object, yielding a detached, “objective” universe, set up for scientists to study and gain knowledge of. Deleuze and Guattari do not read an EBM paper to ascertain its meaning. Rather they analyse how meaning is set up. They would note how the conceptual structure and language created an experimental subject depicted in biomedical terms. They would note the use of fixed terms, fossilised, such as experimental subject, rather than as a continually evolving process. Derrida tells us that, although God and metaphysics have been pushed off the conceptual cliff in out scientific age, we still read with misty, metaphysical eyes. We read in the myth of truth, based on origins and centres, about the realuniverse. We read in the coherence of the paper, and the reliability of reason. We think that words have fixed meanings, and that all readers understand the same as all authors intend.

Keywords


Evidence-based medicine; EBM; subject-object distinction; death of the author; Heidegger; Deleuze; Guattari; Derrida

Full Text:

PDF

References


Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Colin Gordon (ed) (C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

Ward, G. (2003). Teach Yourself Postmodernism. Chicago: McGraw-Hill.

Poole-Wilson, P.A., Swedberg, K., Cleland, J.G.F (2003). Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET): randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 362, 7–13. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13800-7

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, trans.). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text. Edited and translated by Stephen Heath. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans.). London: Continuum.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.) New York, Hagerstown, San Francisco, London. Harper and Row, Publishers. (Original work published 1927).

Appignanesi, R., and Zarate, O. (2001). Introducing Existentialism. Cambridge, UK: Ikon Books.

Kerridge, I. (2010). Ethics and EBM: Acknowledging bias, accepting difference and embracing politics. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, v.16, pp. 365-373.

Colebrook, C. (2002). Understanding Deleuze. Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

Colebrook, C. (2006). Deleuze: A guide for the perplexed. London and New York: Continuum.

Walsh, B. H. (2012). A Post-structuralist View of Evidence-based Medicine. www.librarything.com/work/12707045 (Last viewed 01 03 2015).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v5i4.531

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.