Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A view of Evidence-based Medicine from Karl Popper.

Brian Walsh

Abstract


Background: Popper has argued that knowledge is insecure, and moved the emphasis to conjecture and refutation. Science, Popper avers, does not build up universal laws from singular statements (representing events), since the principle of induction is non-existent. He would see many instances of confirmation of EBM methods, but EBM theory is too vague for refutation.

Methods: I consider whether EBM has a theory, or whether it is heuristic, a method. I examine EBM's use of inductivism and falsificationism. I look at Popper's approach to knowledge (conjecture and refutation) and I relate this to EBM.

Results: Popper writes about how to evaluate whether theories are scientific. But this scarcely applies to EBM. This is because EBM has left theory to the academics while it proceeds to develop and promulgate a method of practising medicine. Contra Popper, EBM does not put forward a theory for scholarly debate or empirical testing. By contrast, it promulgates a strict, detailed method whose merits are self-evident. (Who will argue against the evidence?)

Conclusions: While EBM makes extensive use of falsification in evaluating tests and treatments, as a whole it fails to reach scientific status, as judged by Popper. It scarcely puts forward a risky theory to be challenged, and such theory as can be spider-webbed together is too diffuse to be precisely defined then falsified. Even so, I have provided a guide towards evaluating such EBM theory as there is.


Keywords


Popper; Evidence-based Medicine; EBM; falsification; falsifiability; falsificationism; scientific; evidence; knowledge; objectivity; subjective; inductivism; induction; theory.

Full Text:

PDF

References


. Magee, B. (1998) Confessions of a Philosopher. London: Phoenix, an imprint of Orion Books Ltd.

. Djulbegovic, B., Guyatt, G. H., & Ashcroft, R. E. (2009) ‘Epistemologic Inquiries in Evidence-based Medicine.’ Cancer Control, v. 16, pp. 158-168.

. Popper, K. (2002) Conjectures and Refutations. London and New York: Routledge.

. Holmes, D., Murray, S.J., Perron, A., & Rail, G. (2006) ‘Deconstructing the evidence-based discourse in health sciences: Truth, power and fascism’. International Journal of Evidence-based Healthcare, v. 4, pp. 180-186.

. Popper, K. (2002) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge.

. Magee, B. (1974) Popper. London: Woburn Press.

. Magee, B. (1971) Modern British Philosophy. Bungay, Suffolk: The Chaucer Press.

. Loughlin, M. (2009) ‘The search for substance: a quest for the identity conditions of evidence-based medicine and some comments on Djulbegovic, B., Guyatt, G., & Ashcroft, R.E. (2009) Cancer Control, 16, 158-168.’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, v. 15, pp. 910-914.

. Sackett, D. L., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W. & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Evidence-based Medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone.

. Goldenberg, M J. (2010) ‘From Popperian science to normal science. Commentary on Sestini (2009) “Epistemology and ethics of evidence-based medicine’’’. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, v. 16, pp. 306-309.

. Haynes, R.B., Devereaux, P.J, & Guyatt, G.H. ( 2002) ‘Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice’. ACP Journal Club, v. 136 (2), p. A11.

. Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., & Richardson, W. S. (2000) Evidence Based Medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

. Miles, A. (2009) ‘Evidence-based medicine: Requiescat in pace? A commentary on Djulbegovic, B., Guyatt, G.H. & Ashcroft, R.E. (2009) Cancer Control, 16, 158-168’. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, v. 15, pp. 924-929

. Duncan, P. (2010) ‘Health, health care and the problem of intrinsic value.’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, v. 16, pp. 318-322.

. Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Vist, G.E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Allonso-Coello, P., & Schunemann, H.J., for the GRADE Working Group.’ (2008) GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations’. BMJ, v. 336 (7650), April, pp. 924-926.

. Djulbegovic, B. (2006) ‘Evidence and decision making. Commentary on M. R. Tonelli (2006), “ Integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative approach to evidence-based approaches” ‘. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12, 248-256.’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, v. 12 (3), pp. 257-259.

. Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and Time. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.) New York, Hagerstown, San Francisco, London. Harper and Row, Publishers. (Original work published 1927).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v4i1.461

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.