Communication failure across the perioperative pathway: implications for person-centered healthcare

Article Sidebar

Requires Subscription or Fee PDF (USD 25)
Published: Dec 6, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v2i4.296
Keywords:
Communication communication failure healthcare quality perioperative person-centered healthcare

Main Article Content

Sandra Braaf
Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne
Elizabeth Manias
Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne
Sue Finch
Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne
Robin Riley
Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne
Fiona Munro
Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were systematically to examine communication patterns across the perioperative pathway, to investigate factors associated with communication failure and to examine the consequences of communication failure and its implications for person-centered healthcare.Methods: Structured observations were made of healthcare professionals to record specific attributes of communication and identify communication failure across the perioperative pathway, comprising pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative domains in 3 Australian public hospitals. Generalised linear mixed models with communication failure as a binary outcome were fitted. First, using single explanatory variables and second with combinations of explanatory variables.Results: Over 90 hours, 3,021 communication events and 328 individuals were observed. The odds of communication failure when overlapping communication occurred were over 4 times higher than when it did not (odds ratio (OR) = 4.05, 95% CI: 1.81 to 9.19, p <0.001). For post-anaesthetic care nurses, the odds of failure were 2.6 times greater when multitasking than when not (OR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.76 to 3.85, p<0.001). In contrast, the odds of failure were lower for theatre staff when multitasking than when not (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.98, p = 0.042). Of the healthcare professionals followed, the odds of failure for nurses, surgeons and coordinators were 3 to 4 times higher than the odds of failure for the anaesthetist. The 3 most frequent consequences of communication failure were increased communication interactions, missing information in communication and increased workload.Conclusions: Communication failure occurs regularly within the perioperative environment. Particular attributes of communication events were associated with communication failure and multiple visible consequences across the perioperative pathway. These findings have direct implications for the person-centeredness of clinical services.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 2 No. 4 (2012)
Section
Regular Articles

References

Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). (2007). Improving America's Hospitals: The Joint Commission's Annual Report on Quality and Safety. The Joint Commission.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) & Australian Commission for Safety and Quality of Health Care (ACSQHC). (2008). Sentinel Events Program Annual Report 2007-2008. Melbourne: Rural and Regional Health and Aged Care Services, Victoria Government Department of Human Services.

Australian College of Operating Room Nurses (ACORN). (2006). Standards, guidelines and policy statements. Sydney: Australian College of Operating Room Nurses Ltd.

Christian, C., Gustafson, M., Roth, E., Sheridan, T., Gandhi, T., Dwyer, K., Zinner, M. & Dierks, M. (2006). A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery 139 (2) 159-173.

Gawande, A., Zinner, M., Studdert, D. & Brennan, T. (2003). Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 133, 614-621.

Greenberg, C., Regenbogen, S., Studdert, D., Lipsitz, S., Rogers, S., Zinner, M. & Gawande, A. (2007). Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 204 (4) 533-540.

Lingard, L., Espin, E., Whyte, S., Regehr, G., Reznick, R., Bohen, J., Orser, B., Doran, D. & Grober, E. (2004). Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Quality & Safety in Health Care 12, 330-334.

Williams, R., Silverman, R., Schwind, C., Fortune, J.B., Sutyak, J., Horvath, K.D., Van Eaton, E.G., Azzie, G., Potts, J.R. 3rd, Boehler, M. & Dunnington, G.L. (2007). Surgeon information transfer and communication: factors affecting quality and efficiency of inpatient care. Annals of Surgery 245 (2), 159-169.

Lingard, L., Regehr, G., Espin, S. & Whyte, S. (2006). A theory-based instrument to evaluate team communication in the operating room: balancing measurement authenticity and reliability. Quality & Safety in Health Care 15, 422-426.

Moss, J. & Xiao, Y. (2004). Improving operating room coordination: communication pattern assessment. Journal of Nursing Administration 34 (2) 93-100.

Spencer, R., Coiera, E. & Logan, P. (2004). Variation in communication loads on clinical staff in the Emergency Department. Annals of Emergency Medicine 44 (3) 268-273.

Coiera, E., Jayasuriya, R., Hardy, J., Bannan, A. & Thorpe, M. (2002). Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. The Medical Journal of Australia 176, 415-418.

Alvarez, G. & Coiera, E. (2005). Interruptive communication patterns in the intensive care unit ward round. International Journal of Medical Informatics 74 (10) 791-796.

Healey, A.N., Sevdalis, N. & Vincent, C.A. (2006). Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49, 589-604.

Healey, A., Primus, C. & Koutantji, M. (2007). Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery. Quality & Safety in Health Care 16, 135-139.

Sevdalis, N., Forrest, D., Undre, S., Darzi, A. & Vincent, C. (2008). Annoyances, disruptions, and interruptions in surgery: the disruptions in surgery index (DiSI). World Journal of Surgery 32, 1643-1650.

Sevdalis, N., Healey, A. & Vincent, C. (2007). Distracting communications in the operating theatre. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (3) 390-394.

Wiegmann, D.A., ElBardissi, A.W., Dearani, J.A., Daly, R.C. & Sundt III, T.M. (2007). Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. Surgery 142 (5) 658-665.

Halverson, A.L., Casey, J.T., Andersson, J., Anderson, K., Park, C., Rademaker, A.W. & Moorman, D. (2011). Communication failure in the operating room. Surgery 149 (3) 305-310.

Nagpal, K., Vats, A., Ahmed, K., Vincent, C. & Moorthy, K. (2010). An evaluation of information transfer through the continuum of surgical care: a feasibility study. Annals of Surgery 252 (2) 402-407.

Gillespie, B.M., Chaboyer, W. & Fairweather, N. (2012). Factors that influence the expected length of operation: results of a prospective study. British Medical Journal Quality & Safety 21 (1) 3-12.

Lingard, L., Reznick, R., Espin, S., Regehr, G. & DeVito, I. (2002). Team communications in the operating room: talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices. Academic Medicine 77 (3) 232-237.

Gillespie, B., Chaboyer, W., Longbottom, P. & Wallis, M. (2010). The impact of organisational and individual factors on team communication in surgery: a qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 47, 732-741.

Yule, S., Flin, R., Paterson-Brown, S., Maran, N. & Rowley, D. (2006). Development of a rating system for surgeons' non-technical skills. Medical Education 40 (11) 1098-1104.

Mills, P., Neily, J. & Dunn, E. (2008). Teamwork and communication in surgical teams: implications for patient safety. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 206 (1) 107-112.

Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., Healey, A.N., Darzi, A. & Vincent, C.A. (2006). Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (2) 182-189.

Sexton, J., Makary, M., Tersigni, A., Pryor, D., Hendrich, A., Thomas, E., Holzmueller, C., Knight, A., Wu, Y. & Pronovost, P. (2006). Teamwork in the operating room: frontline perspectives among hospitals and operating room personnel. Anesthesiology 105 (5) 877-884.

Makary, M., Sexton, B., Freischlag, J., Holzmueller, C., Millman, E., Rowen, L. & Pronovost, P. (2006). Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 202 (5) 746 -752.

Carney, B., West, P., Neily, J., Mills, P. & Bagian, J. (2010). Differences in nurse and surgeon perceptions of teamwork: implications for use of a briefing checklist in the OR. AORN Journal 91 (6) 722-729.

Gardezi, F., Lingard, L., Espin, S., Whyte, S., Orser, B. & Baker, G. (2009). Silence, power and communication in the operating room. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65 (7) 1390-1399.

Riley, R. & Manias, E. (2009). Gatekeeping practices of nurses in operating rooms. Social Science & Medicine 69, 215-222.

Flin, R., Fletcher, G., McGeorge, P., Sutherland, A. & Patey, R. (2003). Anaesthetists' attitudes to teamwork and safety. Anaesthesia 58, 233-242.

Parker, J. & Coiera, E. (2000). Improving clinical communication: a view from psychology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 7 (5) 453-461.

Smith, A.F., Pope, C., Goodwin, D. & Mort, M. (2008). Interprofessional handover and patient safety in anaesthesia: observational study of handovers in the recovery room. British Journal of Anaesthesia 101 (3) 332-337.